LSD

Expectancy Effects in Psychedelic Trials

Abstract

Clinical trials of psychedelic compounds like psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and N,N-dimethyltrptamine (DMT) have forced a reconsideration of how nondrug factors, such as participant expectations, are measured and controlled in mental health research. As doses of these profoundly psychoactive substances increase, so does the difficulty in concealing the treatment condition in the classic double-blind, placebo-controlled trial design. As widespread public enthusiasm for the promise of psychedelic therapy grows, so do questions regarding whether and how much trial results are biased by positive expectancy. First, we review the key concepts related to expectancy and its measurement. Then, we review expectancy effects that have been reported in both micro- and macrodose psychedelic trials from the modern era. Finally, we consider expectancy as a discrete physiological process that can be independent of, or even interact with, the drug effect. Expectancy effects can be harnessed to improve treatment outcomes and can also be actively managed in controlled studies to enhance the rigor and generalizability of future psychedelic trials.

Section snippets

Placebo Response, Placebo Effect, and Expectancy

Expert consensus distinguishes the placebo response from the placebo effect (6,7). The placebo response includes all health changes that result after administration of an inactive treatment, which includes behavior related to being observed, i.e., the Hawthorne effect (8), regression to the mean (9), and other nonspecific effects of clinical care (10).

The placebo/nocebo effect refers to the changes that are specifically attributable to placebo mechanisms and can be defined as the difference

Unblinding and Its Relationship to Expectancy

Unblinding occurs when patients recognize their treatment allocation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Usually, unblinding is captured by asking patients at the end of the trial to guess their treatment. If this treatment guess/perceived treatment matches the actual treatment at a higher than chance rate, then the trial has weak blinding integrity.

Most psychiatric trials have not assessed blinding integrity; it has been estimated that in this domain, only 2% to 7% of trials report

Changing Expectancy

Expectancy is not a static trait; rather, it changes dynamically according to new information and experiences (27). The ViolEx model has been proposed to account for both how expectancies change and why they are sometimes maintained even when contradictory information is obtained (27). For example, consider the fact that many psychedelic treatments include more than 1 psychedelic drug session. It is reasonable to assume that patients change their expectations in-between drug sessions as a

Measuring Expectancy and Blinding Integrity

Studies that assess expectancy often use a self-constructed questionnaire rather than a standardized and validated measure, which hinders generalization. To help overcome this issue, here we list validated expectancy measures. The most popular one is the Credibility and Expectancy Scale, which has been shown to have good psychometric properties (34). Alternative measures are the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (35), which focuses on perceived benefits and risks of treatments; the

Macrodose Trials

Blinding integrity has been found to be poor in psychedelic macrodose RCTs that measured it (42, 43, 44). For example, Holze et al. noted that only 1 patient of 20 mistook lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for a placebo (95% correct guess rate) (45). Similarly, Bogenschutz et al. reported that 90 of 95 treated patients correctly guessed their treatment allocation (94% correct guess rate), showing that blinding integrity was almost nonexistent in these trials (4).

Expectancy has only been measured

Separating Expectancy and Drug Effects

Attempts to conceal treatment allocation in psychedelic studies often involve incomplete disclosure of the study design. In some nontherapeutic studies, investigators inform participants that they may receive one among many psychoactive substances, although the actual study design may only involve a limited number of drugs and doses (61,62). For example, in an LSD microdose trial, de Wit et al. told patients that they might receive a hallucinogen/cannabinoid/opioid/stimulant/sedative or placebo

Drug-Placebo Interactions

Most trials consider the observed treatment effect to be the sum of the placebo and the drug effect. However, this simple arithmetic may not apply to all circumstances, for example where interactions exist between drug and placebo effects, i.e., the total treatment effect may be less or more than the sum of the drug and placebo effects (79). Such drug × placebo interactions can be demonstrated in balanced placebo designs; for example, Hammami et al. (80) used a crossover variant of the balanced

Lessons From the Pain Literature

Outsized placebo responses have been problematic for clinical trials of novel pain management drugs and interventions for decades and have contributed to the difficulty in developing novel analgesics despite an impressive array of novel molecular targets validated in animal models (82). Pain, as a sensory experience, can be quantified using various psychophysical measures, which allows for clear delineation of drug-induced relief. In contrast, depression, which is the subject of most

The Neurophysiological Basis of Expectancy

When placebo first appeared in medical dictionaries and texts from the 18th and 19th century, the term was generally defined as an inert substance whose primary value is to soothe, rather than benefit, the patient (61). Since the mid-20th century, most usages of the term preserved the distinction between true benefit and psychological benefit (62), perhaps reflecting the increasing emphasis across medicine and psychiatry that drug therapy could be explained primarily in terms of the drug’s

Conclusions

Expectancy effects are widely expected in psychedelic trials, but to date, only a few studies have assessed them. We distinguish between expectancy and unblinding and recommend treating these as separate but related concepts. A deeper understanding of these effects in psychedelic trials will require, first and foremost, a consistent effort across research groups to incorporate standardized measures of both expectancy and blinding integrity throughout the life cycle of these complex trials, as

Classic Psychedelics and Human-Animal Relations

Previous research has found associations between classic psychedelic use and nature-relatedness, but the link between classic psychedelic use and human–animal relations remains largely unexplored. Using data representative of the US adult population, with regard to age, sex and ethnicity (N = 2822), this pre-registered study assessed lifetime classic psychedelic use, ego dissolution during respondents’ most intense experience using a classic psychedelic, and three measures related to human–animal relations: speciesism, animal solidarity and desire to help animals. The results showed that lifetime classic psychedelic use was negatively associated with speciesism (β = −0.07, p = 0.002), and positively associated with animal solidarity (β = 0.04, p = 0.041), but no association was found with desire to help animals (β = 0.01, p = 0.542). Ego dissolution during the respondents’ most intense experience using a classic psychedelic was negatively associated with speciesism (β = −0.17, p < 0.001), and positively associated with animal solidarity (β = 0.18, p < 0.001) and desire to help animals (β = 0.10, p = 0.007). The findings indicate that classic psychedelics and ego dissolution may have an impact on human–animal relations. As these results cannot demonstrate causality, however, future studies should use longitudinal research designs to further explore the potential causal link between classic psychedelic use and human–animal relations.

Psychedelics as potential catalysts of scientific creativity and insight

Creativity, that is the creation of ideas or objects considered both novel and valuable, is among the most important and highly valued of human traits, and a fundamental aspect of the sciences. Dreams and hypnagogic states have been highly influential in promoting scientific creativity and insight, contributing to some important scientific breakthroughs. Phenomenologically, the latter states of consciousness share a great deal of overlap with the psychedelic state, which has also been associated with facilitating scientific creativity on occasion. The current article proposes that the dream, hypnagogic and psychedelic states share common features that make them conducive to supporting some aspects of scientific creativity and examines the putative underlying neurophenomenological and cognitive processes involved. In addition, some notable occurrences of scientific insights that have emerged from these types of altered states are reviewed and shared common features are presented, providing a ground for future research. The psychedelic state may have its own characteristic features making it amenable to creativity enhancement, such as brain hyperconnectivity, meta-cognitive awareness, access to a more dependable and sustained altered state experience, and potential for eliciting sustained shifts in trait openness. The contextual factors which may contribute to enhancement of scientific creativity and insight will be evaluated. While research in this area is limited, further work to elucidate how psychedelics may best contribute to scientific creativity enhancement is warranted.

Psychedelics and the Default Mode Network

Modern neuroscience has demonstrated that psychedelics such as LSD, psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, as well as ayahuasca operate to significantly reduce activity in the brain’s default mode network (DMN). This reduction in DMN activity functions as a kind of ‘rebooting’ of the brain, and is thought to be linked to one of the most enduring therapeutic effects of psychedelic substances.

Bicycle Day and other Psychedelic Essays

“What are the roots of psychedelic culture? Why are psychedelics seen as transgressive? How was Albert Hofmann’s discovery of LSD’s effects entwined with a world at war? In Bicycle Day and other Psychedelic Essays, Alan Piper explores the often forgotten or ignored early histories of psychoactive drugs that helped shape psychedelia.

Falling between the eighteenth century, the Club des Hashischins and the psychedelic sixties, the less explored interwar period has a surprisingly rich culture of drug-induced mind states, which are intimately connected with the birth of modernism. From the literature of Hope Mirrlees, David Lindsay and Ernst Jünger, to Harvard peyote experiments, Hofmann’s occultic network and the relationship of Sandoz pharmaceuticals with Nazi Germany, Alan Piper’s collection is a rich tapestry of literary and social drug history.”

Investigation of self-treatment with lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin mushrooms: Findings from the Global Drug Survey 2020

Background: Growing numbers of people are using psychedelics for personal psychotherapy outside clinical settings, but research on such use is scarce.
Aims: This study investigated the patterns of use, self-reported outcomes and outcome predictors of psychedelic ‘self-treatment’ of mental health conditions or specific worries/concerns in life.
Methods: We use data from the Global Drug Survey 2020, a large online survey on drug use collected between November 2019 and February 2020. In all, 3364 respondents reported their self-treatment experiences with lysergic acid diethylamide (N = 1996) or psilocybin mushrooms (N = 1368). The primary outcome of interest was the 17-item self-treatment outcome scale, items reflecting aspects of well-being, psychiatric symptoms, social-emotional skills, and health behaviours.
Results: Positive changes were observed across all 17 outcome items, with the strongest benefits on items related to insight and mood. Negative effects were reported by 22.5% of respondents. High intensity of psychedelic experience, seeking advice before treatment, treating with psilocybin mushrooms and treating post-traumatic stress disorder were associated with higher scores on the self-treatment outcome scale after averaging values across all 17 items. Younger age, high intensity of experience and treating with LSD were associated with increased number of negative outcomes.
Conclusions: This study brings important insights into self-treatment practices with psychedelics in a large international sample. Outcomes were generally favourable, but negative effects appeared more frequent than in clinical settings. Our findings can help inform safe practices of psychedelic use in the community, and inspire clinical research. Future research can be improved with utilisation of prospective designs and additional predictive variables.

The Therapeutic Potential of Psychedelic Drugs: Past, Present, and Future

Plant-based psychedelics, such as psilocybin, have an ancient history of medicinal use. After the first English language report on LSD in 1950, psychedelics enjoyed a short-lived relationship with psychology and psychiatry. Used most notably as aids to psychotherapy for the treatment of mood disorders and alcohol dependence, drugs such as LSD showed initial therapeutic promise before prohibitive legislature in the mid-1960s effectively ended all major psychedelic research programs. Since the early 1990s, there has been a steady revival of human psychedelic research: last year saw reports on the first modern brain imaging study with LSD and three separate clinical trials of psilocybin for depressive symptoms. In this circumspective piece, RLC-H and GMG share their opinions on the promises and pitfalls of renewed psychedelic research, with a focus on the development of psilocybin as a treatment for depression.

>